A Case for the Bible: The importance of understanding the transmission of the Bible when practicing Christian Apologetics – Part 2 The New Testament

Last week we looked at the transmission of the Old Testament from the time of Moses to today, roughly a 3500-year period. The New Testament has a shorter transmission timeline, yet it comes under attack by skeptics more than the Old Testament. Could that have anything to do with Jesus being a major part of it?

Over the next few weeks we will also look at the translations and selection process of the Biblical books. In addition, we will look at why we know there were no inspired books left out of the Bible, including the so-called gnostic gospels. And, we will look at the reasons we know the content of the Bible we read today is the same as the original, through the science of textual criticism.

Let’s start with the evidence that most scholars agree on concerning the New Testament:

Historical standards tell us that the earlier an ancient account was written (closer to the events) and the more copies of the account we have, the higher the reliability will be—the New Testament fits this category and here are four major points to affirm this:

  1. New Testament documents are considered primary eyewitness accounts, not secondary, because they were written in the first century during the time people involved were alive to confirm or dispute the events
  2. The writings of the New Testament were immediately copied and widely dispersed throughout the Roman Empire and beyond (see the book of Acts) thus eliminating time for changes, forgeries, or embellishments
  3. We have over 25,000 early New Testament manuscripts and fragments in five different document families from ancient Christian communities, dating as early as the second century, and most of these documents can be viewed in various libraries, museums, and churches around the world – these documents can be studied and compared to make sure that what we have today is accurate
  4. Scholars find a 99.5% agreement between these early manuscripts with the .5% variations stemming mainly from differences in spelling, grammar, word order, and minor deletions or additions (noted in modern Bible footnotes)—none of which effects any doctrine of the Christian faith

The following are the five major New Testament Manuscript Families (from which the 25,000 plus can be examined):

  1. The Western Text: (2nd to 13th century)
  • Includes two early second century manuscripts from the Old Latin and Syriac translations
  • Used mainly in North Africa, and then early on in the west
  • Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Cyprian used this text
  1. The Alexandrian Text: (3rd to 12th century)
  • Originated in Alexandria, Egypt and was used by the early Alexandrian Church fathers
  1. The Caesarean Text: (3rd to 13th century)
  • Thought to be a compilation of the Western and Alexandrian texts
  • Origen and Eusebius are associated with this group of texts

Most of our modern English Bibles today are taken from one of these last two families. The difference between them is about 200 variants or the equivalent a few words:

  1. The Proto-Alexandrian Texts/Critical Text: (2nd to 4th Century)
  • Best known as the “Critical Text” because it has some of the oldest copies available including: Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, Papyrus 66 and the Bodmer Papyrus 75
  • The New American Standard Version (NAS[V]B), English Standard Version (ESV), and New International Version (NIV) reflect this family of texts
  1. The Byzantine Text/Majority Text: (5th to 10th Century)
  • Best known as the “Majority Text” because there are more available copies
  • Adopted in Constantinople and used as the common text in the Byzantine world
  • Martin Luther translated his German Bible from this family
  • The King James Version (KJV, NKJV) reflects this family of texts

Let’s put this together with the Old Testament:

As previously discussed, the books of the Christian Old Testament are the same as the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh). These books are the ones used and accepted by the Jews as Scripture from the time of Moses, through the history of the Nation of Israel, to the time of Jesus. We also find Jesus and the New Testament authors quoting from these same Old Testament books.

Skeptics will say that the New Testament was changed over time, but this is far from true. What is important to remember is that the Christian faith was a missionary faith from its very inception (Matthew 28:19-20; Acts 1:8). The Apostle Paul and others quickly disseminated the New Testament Gospels into surrounding regions (beginning in Acts 8) and continuing on into the known world along with the writings from the Epistles. This rules out any possibility of changes from the originals, as manuscripts everywhere would have had to be changed to match. In addition, because of the quick transmission in the first century eyewitnesses were still alive to dispute errors or changes that could have taken place.

Chain of Custody first three centuries:

As we have seen from the Old Testament, Scribes were responsible for the protection and transmission of the writings. With the onset of the New Testament and the rapid transmission of the Gospels, Acts, and Epistles these writings were copied and preserved in the Christian communities. If doctrinal changes or corruptions occurred after the originals we would find this in the multitudes of early manuscripts from the document families available for comparison. This is called textual criticism (we will look at that later on).

In his book “Cold Case Christianity,” J. Warner Wallace put together a “Chain of Custody” for the New Testament documents from the time that Jesus’ ministry ended (c. 33 AD/CE) to the final canonization in 393-397 AD/CE that can be seen in the following chart:

Mark/Apostle Peter AD 50 Apostle Paul AD 60 Apostle John AD 70
Anianum AD 75 Linus AD 70 Ignatious AD 110

(7-16 books

Polycarp AD 110

(14-16 books)

Avilius AD 95 Clement of Rome AD 95

(7 books)

Irenaeus AD 185

(24 books)

Kedron AD 100

Primus AD 115

Evaristus AD 100

Alexander AD 110

Hippolytus AD 220

(24 books)

Justus AD 130 Sixtus AD 120

Telesphorus AD 130

Hyginus AD 135

Pantaenus AD 195 Pius 1 AD 150

Justin Martyr AD 160

(5 books)

Tatian AD 175 (20 books)

Clement of Alexandria AD 210

(22 books)

Origin AD 250

(27 books)

Pamphilus AD 300

Eusebius AD 335

(27 books)

The first “canon” was the “Muratorian Canon” which was compiled in AD/CE 170 and it included all of the New Testament books except Hebrews, James, and 3 John

The first completed New Testament is from the Council of Laodicea in AD 350-363 called “Codex Sinaiticus”

The most important thing to remember is that these 27 books of the New Testament are the ones being used, and passed on, by Jesus’ followers since the first century and were not just arbitrarily added into the canon by vote in the 4th century AD as skeptics would claim – they were already the ones being used and read in worship!

All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.  2 Timothy 3:16-17 (NASB)

Going Deeper

Watch “Cold Case Christianity,” by J. Warner Wallace, former Cold-Case Homicide Detective, as he gives evidence for the reliability of the Gospels

Reflection

  1. In your own words, briefly summarize the four main points to remember in the transmission of the New Testament.
  2. What are the “Manuscript Families” and why are they important?
  3. Briefly summarize the “Chain of Custody” for the New Testament and why it is important.
  4. PTRs (Praise—Thanksgiving—Repent—Request): Focus—Thankfulness for God’s hand in the transmission of His Word so that we still have it to guide us today.

Bible Study

Each week we do a Bible study to practice our Bible study skills. Read or re-read 2 Corinthians chapter 2, then answer the following questions:

  1. In chapter 2 Paul continues (from chapter 1) explaining his actions. What was the reason that he had decided not to go to Corinth at this time? (2:1-4)
  2. In 2:5-11 Paul revisits the problem he addressed in 1 Corinthians chapter 5. What was that problem?
  3. What does Paul tell them to do about that problem now? (2:5-11) What is the emphasis in verse 11 that is important for us to remember?
  4. In continuing the defense of his ministry, where does Paul say that he went and what did he do? (2:12-17)

Join us next week as we continue our Case for the Bible series by looking at the reason for so many “Translations”!

——————————————————————————————

You will not find this material in the public school curriculum even though it is based on solid evidence and grounded in research. It is ironic that following the evidence to where it leads stops at the door of our public schools as they will not let a “Divine footprint” in!  Join us as we examine evidence for Christianity and learn how to become a thoughtful defender and ambassador of your faith.

Click into the resource page of this website to view many of the top Christian thinkers and apologists along with some of their work; connecting to these types of resources is essential in your Christian growth.

Please let me know what you think: Give feedback, ask questions or send concerns in the comment section of the blog.

Teri Dugan

TeriDugan@truthfaithandreason.com

1 Peter 3:15

Sorry, comments are closed for this post.